Dictators: Rise of 20thC Dictators | Rule of 20thC Dictators
Wars: Origins of Wars | WW1 / WW2: origins compared
Tsar Alexander II
Tsar Alexander III
IGCSE Revision and Study Skills
•IGCSE Paper 1 Model Answers
IBDP Essay/Sourcework Skills •IB Historiography / TOK •IB Internal Assessment • IB Extended Essay •30+ Model Essays •IB Curriculum Map •IB Revision
Early Modern British:
Henry VII | Henry VIII 1509-1529 | Henry VIII 1529-1547 | Edward VI | Mary I | Elizabeth I
Lutheran Reformation | Zwingli/Calvin/ Radicals | Counter-Reformation | Ferdinand/Isabella | Charles I/Phillip II | Ottoman Empire | French Revolution / Napoleon
Please fill in the following form to contact the author, Russel Tarr
ActiveHistory provides entertaining, educational award-winning interactive simulations, decision-making games, self-marking quizzes, high-quality worksheets and detailed lesson plans for teachers and students.
View the top 75 activities here.
Note: This plan uses Fidel Castro's regime in Cuba as the example, but it works for any ruler that you care to study.
- In this phase of the investigation, students will consider carefully how historians can empirically measure the ‘success’ of a regime. They will do this firstly from a general democratic perspective, and then adapt and refine their criteria by considering dictatorships in general, and left-wing dictatorships in particular.
- It is assumed that students have an understanding of the basic differences between left- and right-wing ideology is assumed to get the most out of this unit.
- With what degree of success did Castro deal with the problems he faced?
- Was Castro a totalitarian ruler?
- Compare and contrast the rule of Castro with another other dictator from a different region.
a. How do we measure ‘success’ in a general sense, from a modern democratic perspective?
Begin by discussing with the class how we might measure whether a present-day democratic government is a ‘success’.
For each point raised, ensure that it is measurable.
Some ideas about how we can measure ‘success’ (from a straightforward democratic perspective)
Low unemployment | Few strikes | Low inflation | Good balance of trade | Growth in real wages |
High birth rate | Increasing life expectation | High literacy rates | Civil rights promoted (how?) | Sexual equality promoted (how?) | Forges a strong national identity
Free press | Regime works constructively with the church | Propaganda highlights positive achievements rather then demonises perceived opponents
No mass demonstrations against the regime | No political trials / prisoners | Free, fair, regular elections | Parliament has real power to hold government to account
NOTE: some research on the Human Development Index might provide useful avenues of enquiry; you could even get the Geography students / teacher(s) to teach the historians how to approach their investigation.
b. How does the measure of ‘success’ change when we consider this dictatorship rather than a democracy?
- The list which should now be developed is a great starting point for measuring the success of a democratic regime. But now go back through the list adapting it to provide a measurement of ‘success’ for the dictatorship in question.
- Many of the criteria will remain unchanged: a dictatorship will still want low unemployment, for example.
However, other measurements will not be applicable – for example, a dictatorship will want to destroy genuine Parliamentary power rather than preserve or enhance it.
- Other measurements will depend upon the particular ideology of the dictatorship in question: for example, a left-wing dictatorship would measure its success with women by increasing their employment rates/opportunities, whereas a right-wing dictatorship would focus more on providing them with incentives to stay at home and devote themselves to the family. Similarly, a left-wing government will regard nationalisation of industry as a sign of success, whereas a right-wing government will support privatisation.
- The criteria now identified should now be categorised, then converted into questions that can be shared between the students in the class to research further (“Was Castro successful in improving literacy rates in Cuba?”).
- Students should be given the time and resources to find the answers to their questions, then report back to the class with their findings. Encourage students in the research phase to beware of simplistic answers: a sophisticated historical answer often starts with ‘it depends…’ (for example, short- versus long-term, town versus countryside, and so on).
- TIP: Instead of straightforward presentations, the exercise could be set up with more experienced students as a debate, or an arbitration exercise.
- The students are now in a strong position to write their essay, making use of the essay-marking rubric and the online video documentary.
- Beyond this, they should make use of the following prompt to help them ensure that they have sufficient content coverage. There is the Castro’s Cuba: online keyword checker that they can use to quickly test whether their essays miss out anything important.
- Forced resignations from the cabinet of Urrutia, Lanz
- Role of Raul, Castro's brother
- Opposition of Anibal Escalante
- Release of Valladares and Menoyo
- 1976 Constitution
- Impact of collapse of USSR
- Agrarian Reform Acts
- Role of Che Guevara
- "New Socialist Man"
- "Revolutionary Offensive" 1968
- "Ten Million Sugar Crop" campaign 1970
- Impact of adventures in Angola, Ethiopia, Granada
- "Campaign of Rectification of Errors and Negative Tendencies"
- The "Special Period"
- Impact of collapse of USSR
- Family Code
- First Congress of Cuban Writers and Artists
- Trial of Herberto Padilla
- The "Grey Period"
- Peruvian Embassy Crisis
- Mariel boatlift
A useful exercise is to conduct a matrix assessment of Castro. Divide the board with a horizontal and a vertical line to create four squares:
- Students then decide what evidence can be placed in different parts of the diagram. They may for example decide that the 10-million ton sugar crop initiative was totalitarian, but a failure (top right), but that other policies belong elsewhere.
- The completed diagram can be a very valuable essay planning resource since it provides a path through two essay titles.
Directly following the completion of the in-depth case study of one rule, or after a suitable interval later in the course, students should proceed to compare and contrast two separate dictators from different regions.
To do this, they should base their investigation around the ActiveHistory interactive simulation “Which 20th Century Dictator are YOU?”. This is a stand-alone simulation to help students compare and contrast how single-party state rulers maintained power. It guides students through 10 key issues explaining how and why dictatorships are able to survive. Students complete the accompanying self-study workpack to turn their findings into a rigorous essay. It also provides a great way of revising and developing their earlier essay focusing on one dictator.
© 1998-2020 Russel Tarr, ActiveHistory.co.uk Limited (Reg. 6111680)
High Park Lodge, Edstaston Wem, Shropshire, England, SY4 5RD. Telephone/Fax: 01939 233909
Births (350 years ago today): 1670 – John Aislabie, English politician, Chancellor of the Exchequer (d. 1742)
Births (100 years ago today): 1920 – Nadir Afonso, Portuguese painter and architect (d. 2013)
Deaths (750 years ago today): 1270 – Theobald II of Navarre (b. 1238)
RSS Feed | Full week | Get Widget